Sunday's Prayer
--Benjamin Jenks (1646-1724)
Read more!
Encountering Jesus in the Creative Play of the Imagination
For God is infinite actuality, the source and end of all being, the eternally good, for whom mere arbitrary "choice"--as among possibilities that somehow exceed his "present" actuality--would be a deficiency, a limitation placed upon his infinite power to be God. His freedom is the impossibility of any force, pathos, or potentiality interrupting the perfection of his nature of hindering him in the realization of his own illimitable goodness, in himself and in his creatures. To be "capable" of evil--to be able to do evil or to be affected by an encounter with it--would in fact be an incapacity in God; and to require evil to bring about his good ends would make him less than the God he is. The object of God's will is his own infinite goodness, and it is an object perfectly realized, and so he is free (71-72).According to Hart, God has made the creation in freedom and in that very freedom is the possibility of resisting God and God's will. He writes, "God has fashioned creatures in his image so that they might be joined in a perfect union with him in the rational freedom of love. For that very reason, what God permits, rather than violate the autonomy of the created world, may be in itself contrary to what he wills" (82).
Other than telling me that he thought children were "adaptable," he seemed hardly interested in the issue, as if he had never really thought about it. For example, when I told him that marriage as an institution is centrally concerned 2with procreation in all human societies, he rejected the idea out of hand, proposing instead that marriage aw a natural human institution is largely about private property...For me, marriage is fundamentally about the needs of children. And in thinking and writing about it for nearly two decades, I have come to believe one thing with more certainty than anything else: What children need most are mothers and fathers. Not caregivers. Not parent-like adults. Not even "parents." What a child wants and needs more than anything else are the mother and the father who together made the child, who love the child, and who love each others (2-3).He states that marriage is the most important of all social institutions and from an evolutionary and anthropological point of view "the decisive turning point in our history as a species" (4). Marriage, Blankenhorn believes is by far the most pro-child institution that we have. He notes that in the 70's and 80's when the amount of divorce was drastically increasing, the majority of opinion by scholars was that children's well-being was only marginally associated with marriage and family structure. However, after a plethora of research conducted in the 80's and 90's the results caused a drastic reassessment of this previous position and, in fact, overturned it. The research clearly demonstrated that marriage matters. It makes a significant impact on the health and well-being of our children.
If our national debate on same-sex marriage is finally to be redemptive rather than divisive, it needs to meet two tests. First, it must not only accept but also deepen and advance the principle that all persons are equal in rights and dignity. Second, it must also help us rediscover and renew marriage as the main protector of our children and our primary social institution" (8).I'm hoping that this book review generates some good discussion about this very important topic.