Thoughts on the Blogosphere
The author, Sven Birkerts, is concerned with the effects of the blogosphere on literary culture. He notes that in the last several years newspapers like the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, and even the Boston Globe have all cut back on book reviews on their pages. When the Atlanta Journal-Constitution eliminated the editor for book reviews in favor of wire service reviews, it caught people's attention.
Embedded in the article are a couple of paragraphs that I thought particularly insightful and reminded me of Philip Rieff's thoughts in his classic book, The Triumph of the Therapeutic, and his discussion on the function of culture and it's regulating and boundary setting function. Birkets writes
My impulse is to argue that if the Web at large is the old Freudian "polymorphous perverse," that libidinally undifferentiated miasma of yearnings and gratifications, unbounded and free, then culture itself--what we have been calling "culture" at least since the Enlightenment--is he emergent maturity that constrains unbounded freedom in the interest of mattering.In a culture that increasingly worships the sovereign self and rejects any kind of "authority," I wonder how most people will receive Birket's argument As a lover of print, I found the article compelling. What do you think?
But this mattering requires the existence of a common ground, a shared set of traditions--a center which is the collectively known picture of private and public life as set out by artists and thinkers, and discussed and debated not just by everyone with an opinion, but also most effectively by the self-constituted group of those who have made it their purpose to do so. Arbiters, critics...reviewers.
The blogosphere, I would argue, works in the opposite direction. There are arbiers aplenty...but the very nature of the blogosphere is proliferation and dispersal; it is centrifugal and represents a fundamental reversal of the norms of print culture.
Read more!






