Thought for the Day
--St. Thomas Aquinas
Read more!
Encountering Jesus in the Creative Play of the Imagination
Congregations could be a valuable source of support for young adults. They could be places where young adults gravitate to talk about the difficult decisions they are facing or to meet other people of the same age. Congregations could be guiding the career decisions of younger adults or helping them think about their budgets and their personal priorities. But, again to anticipate the evidence in subsequent chapters, this potential is often going unrealized. It will continue to go unrealized as long as congregations invest in youth programs for high school students and assume this is enough. It will also go unrealized if congregational leaders focus on their graying memberships and do not look more creatively to the future (13).He uses the word, tinkering, to capture how young adults address religion and spirituality. He does not intend a negative connotation for this word which it sometimes carries; on the contrary he writes, "Tinkerers are the most resourceful people in any era" (13). A number of influences such as globalization, less job security and more social instability have led to this age group as tinkerers.
He [the pope] recommended a program of dialogue and interaction, in which science and religion would seek neither to supplant each other nor to ignore each other. They should search together for a more thorough understanding of one another's competencies and limitations, and they should look especially for common ground. Science should not try to become religion, nor should religion seek to take the place of science. Science can purify religion from error and superstition, while religion purifies science from idolatry and false absolutes. Each discipline should therefore retain its integrity and yet be open to the insights and discoveries of the other.If only we would heed this advise!
Some contemporary scientific atheists are so caught up in the methodology of their discipline that they imagine it must be the only method for solving every problem. But other methods are needed for grappling with questions of another order. Science and technology (science's offspring) are totally inadequate in the field of morality...The tendency of science, when it gains the upper hand, is to do whatever lies within its capacity, without regard for moral constraints...To distinguish between the right and wrong use of power, and to motivate human beings to do what is right even when it does not suit their convenience, requires recourse to moral and religious norms.We need to better inform ourselves about the relationship between science and religion especially in relation to the issues involved in evolution so that we can elude the simplistic arguing that occurs in the popular press and so that we can engage in dialogue that is thoughtful and gracious that will lead to greater understanding.
For grossly imperfect creatures like us, morality may be the steepest of all developmental mountains. Our opposable thumbs and big brains gave us the tools to dominate the planet, but wisdom comes more slowly than physical hardware. We surely have a lot of killing and savagery ahead of us beforewe fully civilize ourselves.The hope--a realistic one, perhaps--is that the struggles still to come are fewer than those left behind.I hope that we keep making progress in understanding the brain, but I think our hope for becoming better lies in a different direction.
Although social networking sites are in their infancy we are seeing their impact culturally: in language (where to friend is now a verb), in politics (where it is de rigueur for presidential aspirants to catalogue their virtues on MySpace), and on college campuses (where not using Facebook can be a social handicap). But we are only beginning to come to grips with the consequences of our use of these sites: for friendship, and for our notions of privacy, authenticity, community, and identity...Does this technology, with its constant demands to collect (friends and status), and perform (by marketing ourselves), in some ways undermine our ability to attain what it promises--a surer sense of who we are and where we belong? The Delphic oracle's guidance was know thyself. Today, in the world of online social networks, the oracle's advice might be show thyself (15-16).I think Rosen has written an insightful article that asks important questions. One of the basic ones is, What is friendship? It seems to me that "friend" and "friendship" has been devalued in cyberspace, and may, indeed, lead to more superficial friendships. Rosen writes, "The structure of social networking sites also encourages the bureaucratization of friendship. Each sit has its own terminology, but among the words that users employ most often is 'managing'...There is something Orwellian about the management-speak on social networking sites..."(27).
But some nonbelievers are beginning to think they might need something [values/moral education] for their children. "When you have kids," says Julie Willey, a design engineer, "you start to notice that your co-workers or friends have church groups to help teach their kids values and to be able to lean on." So every week, Willey, who was raised Buddhist and says she has never believed in God, and her husband pack their four kids into their blue minivan and head to the Humanist Community Center in Palo Alto, Calif., for atheist Sunday school.